News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 GAIC tax to hit farming land 

GAIC tax to hit farming land

02 Aug, 2010 01:00 AM
A SWATHE of farming land between Cranbourne and Pakenham has been rezoned into Melbourne's urban growth boundary as part of a 43,600-hectare increase across metropolitan Melbourne.

The state government says the move will address housing affordability but opponents claim it will destroy the green wedge and put further pressure on services and infrastructure in the region.

The decision will invariably mean land in the area will be subject to the growth areas infrastructure contribution (GAIC), which places a $95,000 vendor tax on each hectare of property sold.

Michael Hocking, spokesman for protest group Taxed Out, said the group would campaign against Labor in the state and federal elections on the issue.

He was hopeful that the state opposition would alter the GAIC so it applied when land was at the point of development, rather than retrospectively. Mr Hocking said the Clyde-based Oakwood Riding School, of which he is a director, could be forced to sell up if it was bisected by a planned extension of Thompsons Road.

A purchaser of the school would then face a $1million GAIC bill if it sold.

"The way this is designed there would be no place for a riding school in the area in the future. It will just be miles of housing developments with a smattering of parks and playgrounds."

Cardinia environmentalist Catherine Manning said the move would lead to road congestion and the consumption of much-needed agricultural land.

"The urban sprawl will just cause more pressure on roads and public transport, and add more cost to low-income families living in these so-called affordable estates."

Brian Welch, executive director of the Master Builders Association of Victoria, backed the government's claims that the GAIC would drive the price of housing down.

"More land means more room for builders to create affordable communities for Victorian families to live, work and play."

Casey mayor Lorraine Wreford said she had no objection to growth in the region but was disappointed it would come at the expense of prime agricultural land.

Cr Wreford said there were other areas in the municipality, namely parts of Cranbourne West, that could accommodate the residential growth.

"How is it sustainable to get rid of your food bowl?"

Planning Minister Justin Madden said infrastructure in growth areas, particularly public transport, would benefit from the GAIC as a dedicated funding source. "We are taking the responsible action of releasing more land for housing alongside a clear plan to fund the basic services and infrastructure for people who move into these areas."

BOOM OR BUST?

"THIS is completely at odds with what the federal government's saying about a sustainable Australia."

- Michael Hocking, Taxed Out spokesman

"IT'S a disgrace that developer profits have been put before the importance of protecting Melbourne's prime food production land."

- Catherine Manning, environmentalist

"THI S decision will help ease the concerns of many Victorian families who simply cannot afford to live in inner Melbourne."

- Brian Welch, Master Builders Association

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


No comments yet. Be the first to comment below.

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Rough riding: Leanna Bray and Helen Hart of Oakwood Riding School, which faces a $1 million tax bill. Picture: Mike Richards
Rough riding: Leanna Bray and Helen Hart of Oakwood Riding School, which faces a $1 million tax bill. Picture: Mike Richards

Most popular articles




Casey Weekly







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...